PROMIS in MIS lumbar fusion procedures shows validity: 5 things to know

Mackenzie Garrity -   Print  |

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System was developed to improve patient-reported outcomes inefficiencies.

A study published in the Journal of Neurosurgery compared results from the system against the Oswestry Disability Index and the 36-Item Short Form Survey to determine its validity for patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Additionally, researchers compared SF-12 physical function and visual analog scale back and leg scores.

Here are five things to know:

1. PROMIS implements computer-adaptive testing that enables the assessment of physical function in fewer questions than the ODI and SF-36.

2. Researchers included patients who underwent primary level 1 or level 2 MIS TLIF proceduresThey excluded patients who had incomplete PROMIS data.

3. Changes in PROMIS physical function scores at six weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months were analyzed and compared against the patient-reported surveys.

4. In all, 74 patients were included in the analysis of the validity of PROMIS. The mean PROMIS score was 35.92 ± 6.98.

5. PROMIS scores revealed significant improvements 12 weeks and six months postoperative. The system showed significant correlation with the SF-12, ODI and VAS leg scores.

"These results suggest that PROMIS scores can be used as a valid assessment of physical function in MIS TLIF patients," the study authors concluded. "Further work is required to determine the full benefit of this measure in other spine populations."

More articles on MIS:
GS Medical launches minimally invasive pedicle screw system: 3 things to know
DISC Sports & Spine Center publishes guide to minimally invasive spine surgery
Atlantic Spine Center welcomes Dr. Jason Arora: 5 notes

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.

Featured Webinars

Featured Whitepapers