Here are three things to know:
1. The surgeon and practice developed a business model for treating personal injury patients, which the defense attorneys in one case labeled a “de factor joint business venture” with the plaintiffs. The defense claimed the surgeon and practice “specialize[d] in helping personal injury patients maximize their recovery” and a U.S. District Judge agreed, ordering the group to pay a $8,970 fee.
2. The spine practice denies those claims, stating the group aims to cooperate with patients’ attorneys in a “highly professional manner” and maintained that the group provides the “best possible medical care” to all patients.
3. In addition to treating personal injury patients, the group offers payment options for patients, including a lien on potential litigation recovery. The defense argued this arrangement meant the surgeon had a financial stake in the outcome of the case, while the spine group’s attorneys argued their model is a common industry practice. Regardless of the litigation outcome, patients are still responsible for their medical bills.
More articles on spine surgery:
12 spine, neurosurgeons with leadership promotions in 2018
Where 26 spine surgeons, neurosurgeons moved in the 1st half of 2018
California spine, neurosurgeon indicted for allegedly accepting $40M in kickbacks
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
