Here are four highlights:
1. MIS spinal fusion allows implantation of posterior interbody devices with limited damage to surrounding muscles.
2. Studies have demonstrated MIS approaches yield shorter hospital stays and less medication use post-surgery.
3. Critics of MIS techniques argue the limited access to the spine may inhibit their ability to fully address the pathology.
4. Companies develop interbody devices in the form of cages or spacers.
More articles on MIS:
7 things to know on XLIF for revision surgeries
Dr. Kornelis Poelstra completes 200 spinal surgeries with Mazor X: 5 things to know
Dr. Neel Anand conducts study on new vs. old protocols for circumferential minimally invasive surgical correction of adult spinal deformity — 10 observations
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.