The researchers collected surveys from spine surgeons describing eight clinical scenarios; the surgeons responded with the appropriate answer for their current practice and then responded in the hypothetical bundled payment system.
There were 43 surgeons who completed the survey. The researchers found:
1. In every scenario, there were respondents who would change at least one aspect of their practice with bundled payments; 24 percent to 49 percent of the surgeons reported change for each scenario.
2. Four scenarios had an increase in the proportion of cases performed without implants by an average of 8 percent; the other four scenarios didn’t have a change in whether implants were used.
3. Iliac crest bone graft use was increased in all scenarios by an average of 18 percent if bundled payments were implemented.
4. Surgeons were more likely to decrease neuromonitoring with bundled payments; the neuromonitoring would decrease in all scenarios by an average of 21 percent.
5. The cost differences weren’t statistically significant.
More articles on spine surgery:
Minimally invasive spine surgery is the future: Q&A with Dr. Frank Phillips of Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
How minimally invasive spine surgery fits in value-based healthcare: Q&A with Dr. Brian Gantwerker
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.
