More Spine Studies Complying With Randomized Controlled Trial Criteria Needed

The authors of a recent study analyzing randomized controlled trial reporting in spine literature recommends surgeons and scientists place greater emphasis on complying with randomized controlled study guidelines to improve quality data, according to the study’s abstract published in Spine.

Advertisement

The researchers examined all randomized controlled trials published in three spine journals from 2008 in regards to the 40 criteria derived from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. A total of 32 RCTs met these criteria.

Among these studies, the average modified CONSORT score was 65 percent. Disclosing certain criteria, such as the method of generation of random sequence, allocation concealment and identification of outcome measures, was associated with a higher overall score. The inclusion of a flow chart or description of the patient numbers at different stages was also associated with a higher score.

Read the abstract about spine studies.

Related Articles on Spine Surgery:

Study: Full-Endoscopic Approach for Spinal Stenosis Patients Effective

Study Identifies Effective Tools for Examining Lower Back Pain

Study: TLIF Helpful for Lumbar Scoliosis Patients

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.