X-Stop Spine Surgery: Outcomes Analysis

A new study published in Spine examines how the X-Stop interspinous distraction device could fail.

Advertisement

The researchers evaluated 46 patients who underwent implantation of X-Stop interspinous spacer for treating neurogenic claudication with an average follow-up of 40 months. They found the revision rate at 30.4 percent and discovered:

 

•    Lack of improvement at six-week follow up was correlated with revision surgery.
•    Revision procedures predominantly took place 12 months after the index surgery.
•    Patients who didn’t need revision surgery experienced significant improvement in clinical outcomes.
•    Implant survival rate probability was 0.68 on the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at 48 months postoperatively.

 

The authors suggested patient selection could be a reason for early revision surgery.

 

More Articles on Spine Surgery:
5 Characteristics Associated With Spine Surgery Complications
How Can Spine Surgeons See High ROI From Marketing
Where is Spinal Fusion Headed? Q&A With Dr. Mark Crawford of ABQ Health

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Spinal Tech

Advertisement

Comments are closed.