Supreme Court will not review Zimmer Biomet-Stryker $248.7M patent dispute

In a nearly decades-old case, the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review its decision in a patent infringement case between Stryker and Zimmer Biomet. 

Advertisement

 

Stryker initially sued Zimmer Biomet in 2010 for infringing on patents for Stryker’s pulsed lavage devices; a jury found in favor of Stryker in 2013 and the court tripled the award damages after finding the infringement willful in 2014.

While Zimmer Biomet was ordered to pay $248.7 million, the company argued the payment was not proportional to the infringement scope and at the time was among the largest awards for a patent infringement case. Since then, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that courts were too rigid on willful infringement, but the judge reaffirmed his decisions.

The appeals court has decided not to review its previous decision.

More articles on orthopedic devices:
Centinel Spine device for total disc replacement celebrates 18 years
10 device company notes
Stryker enters into licensing, distribution agreement with Conformis

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

160 ambulatory leaders just ranked the EHR as the single system most overdue for AI reinvention

Tuesday, August 11
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Presenter: Gautam Shah, MBA, FACHDM, NextGen Healthcare

Advertisement

Next Up in Spinal Tech

Advertisement

Comments are closed.