Researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 248 total knee arthroplasty hospitalizations, of which 126 patients received ConforMIS iTotal customized knee implants and 122 received standard implants between March 2010 and November 2013.
According to the analysis, patients with the off-the-shelf implants had an adverse event rate of 13.9 percent, while the rate for patients with the ConforMIS implant was 1.6 percent. Also, patients treated with ConforMIS implants had blood transfusion rates of 2.4 percent compared with 10.7 percent for the OTS implants.
The analysis also revealed that 0.8 percent of patients with ConforMIS were discharged to more costly acute-care facilities as compared to 7.4 percent for patients with standard implants.
The results were presented by Steven D. Culler, PhD, associate professor at Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University in Atlanta, at the 2014 International Congress for Joint Reconstruction Pan Pacific Orthopaedic Congress that recently convened in Hawaii.
More Articles on Devices:
5 Key Results: LDR’s Mobi-C Artificial Disc Replacement vs. ACDF
FDA Clears AccelSPINE’s Next Generation Minimally Invasive Spine System
Global Medical Device Market to Grow at 6.2% Annually Until 2018
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.
