Automated RAC reviews of Part B claims already have been targeting E/M codes in the global period of surgical procedures, and “I fully expect the RACs to expand this focus to include modified E/M services when complex review of Part B claims commences in earnest,” wrote J. Paul Spencer of Fi-Med.
Many physicians do not understand that modifer -25 indicates a significant, separately identifiable E/M service performed on the same day as another procedure or service. “Unless the patient presents with a new problem requiring a workup wholly separate from the scheduled procedure, the billing of an E/M service with a -25 modifier is not appropriate,” Mr. Spencer wrote.
On the other hand, a -25 modifier might be allowed for the “doorknob patient,” the patient who brings up a wholly different symptom while leaving the exam room. “If the provider documents a separate history, exam and medical decision-making process for the patient’s new problem, it would be appropriate to bill an additional E/M service with the -25 modifier,” Mr. Spencer wrote.
Read the RAC Monitor report on CPT codes.
Read more coverage of RACs:
– RACs Face Weak Penalties for Exceeding 60-Day Limit to Review Records
– 3 Ways RAC Audits Differ From Previous Medicare Audits
– 4 Ways Medicaid RACs Could Differ From Medicare RACs
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.
