Why Doesn’t “Choosing Wisely” Address Spinal Fusion? NASS Responds

An article in Kaiser Health News analyzed the Choosing Wisely campaign, questioning why the North American Spine Society placed “using bone growth material in spinal fusion in the neck” on the list when the FDA issued a safety alert about the practice in 2008. The article questioned how many surgeons would perform the procedure and criticized the group for not addressing spinal fusions, which have grown significantly over the past decade.

Advertisement

NASS answered with a letter published last week, explaining the goals of the “Choosing Wisely” campaign and how it developed the recommendations.

 

“Choosing Wisely is not focused on avoiding tests or procedures as a way to lower healthcare costs, but instead is focused on avoiding harm and eliminating waste. A byproduct of fewer patients receiving unnecessary care will be fewer dollars spent on healthcare,” said NASS Choosing Wisely Task Force Chair F. Todd Wetzel, MD.

 

The organization said it did not address spinal fusion due to gaps in the scientific literature, according to the letter. Additionally, the recommendations against using bone growth material in cervical spinal fusion were necessary, argued the letter, because the practice has not “completely ceased.”

 

More Articles on Spine Surgery:
Decision-Making in Spine: Challenges in Providing Evidence-Based Care From Dr. Frank Phillips
20 Spine Surgeons Leading ASCs
Administrative Data: Where Are the Limits in Spine?

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.