Study Compares Three Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Devices

A study recently published in Spine examined the difference between the PercuDyne, X-Stop and Isobar Posterior stabilization devices for posterior dynamic stabilization.

Advertisement

The devices were compared using in vitro cadaveric models and the measurements included foraminal area and posterior and anterior disc height. The researchers found the injury model was the most successful to increase range of motion and decrease disc height and foraminal area.

The PercuDyne system was most effective in preventing hyperextension. The X-Stop system was able to stabilize the posterior column and increase foraminal area in all conditions. The Isobar was the only device that stabilized the anterior column.

Related Articles on Spine Surgery:

Study: 3D Scans Help Preplan Scoliosis Procedures

Study Predicts Intraoperative Spine Waste Costs $126M

Study: Spinal Manipulation Therapy and Maintenance Improves Low Back Pain

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

160 ambulatory leaders just ranked the EHR as the single system most overdue for AI reinvention

Tuesday, August 11
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Presenter: Gautam Shah, MBA, FACHDM, NextGen Healthcare

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.