Study Compares Biomechanics After Two Methods of Cervical Spine Surgery

A study recently published in Spine compared cervical spine biomechanics after patients either underwent total disc replacement adjacent to a fusion or a two-level fusion.

Advertisement

Researchers examined nine cadaveric cervical spines under load- and displacement-control testing and found the external fixator device simulating fusion significantly reduced the range of motion at C4-C5 and C6-C7. The range of motion returned after removing the fusion construct.

Arthroplasty using the porous-coated motion disc at C5-C6 maintained total flexion-extension ROM. Two-level fusions significantly increase motion demands on nonoperative segments when compared with the TDR and fusion construct.

Related Articles on Spine Surgery:

Study: Mixing Local Anesthetics With Steroids for Caudal Epidural Injections Relieve Disc Herniation Pain

Study Compares Bipedicular to Unipedicular Kyphoplasty

Study: Most Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Patients Don’t Require Routine Postoperative Radiographs

At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.