Study Compares Biomechanics After Two Methods of Cervical Spine Surgery

A study recently published in Spine compared cervical spine biomechanics after patients either underwent total disc replacement adjacent to a fusion or a two-level fusion.

Advertisement

Researchers examined nine cadaveric cervical spines under load- and displacement-control testing and found the external fixator device simulating fusion significantly reduced the range of motion at C4-C5 and C6-C7. The range of motion returned after removing the fusion construct.

Arthroplasty using the porous-coated motion disc at C5-C6 maintained total flexion-extension ROM. Two-level fusions significantly increase motion demands on nonoperative segments when compared with the TDR and fusion construct.

Related Articles on Spine Surgery:

Study: Mixing Local Anesthetics With Steroids for Caudal Epidural Injections Relieve Disc Herniation Pain

Study Compares Bipedicular to Unipedicular Kyphoplasty

Study: Most Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Patients Don’t Require Routine Postoperative Radiographs

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.