Scoliosis patient data gathering — Phone vs. in-office: 5 key notes on the difference

A new study published in The Spine Journal examines how reliable the revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires are in adult spinal deformity when administered by telephone.

Advertisement

The study includes 49 patients who were 55.7 years old on average. The patients had adult spinal deformity and were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to complete either over-the-phone or in-office. There were also patients who underwent in-office completion followed by phone completion.

 

Here are five things to know:

 

1. There weren’t any difference between the phone and in-office versions of the SRS-22r or the ODI.

 

2. The intraclass correlation coefficient for SRS-22r was 0.91.

 

3. The intraclass correlation coefficient for ODI as 0.86.

 

4. The most popular option was completing the scores over the phone. More than half — 57 percent preferred the phone call; only 29 percent preferred the in-office interviews. Fourteen percent didn’t have a preference.

 

5. The phone administration provided a convenient and reliable tool to reduce follow-up data loss, the study authors concluded.

 

More articles on spine surgery:
Lumbar discectomy recovery longer than anticipated—4 observations
MIS vs. open posterior lumbar spinal fusion: 5 things to know
5 things to know about scoliosis surgery complications: Does age make a difference?

At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.