• Family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery wins $35M verdict against hospital
  • Orthopedic surgeon wins $20M verdict against Johnson & Johnson
  • Minnesota orthopedic group hit with $111M negligence verdict
  • Orthopedic patient's death highlights potential dangers of prior authorization
  • Spine surgeon's video hits 1 million views on TikTok
  • Spine surgeon killed in Oklahoma hospital shooting
  • Spine surgeon owes $17M to paralyzed patient
  • Providence to pay $22.7M to settle unnecessary spine surgery allegations
  • Spine surgeon gets jail time for abusing patient during hospital visit
  • 'They're on really thin ice': Why 1 insurer has drawn spine surgeons' ire
  • Connecticut hospital to appeal $12.5M verdict to family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery
  • Orthopedic surgeon must face suit in patient's death
  • 23 spine device companies to watch in 2022
  • Spine surgeon 1 of 9 physician billionaires on Forbes' 2022 list
  • 4 spine technologies that promised more than they delivered
  • Orthopedic surgeon salary vs. average household income in each state
  • Orthopedic surgeon's health system exit steeped in controversy
  • Terminated orthopedic surgeon contracts with another New York hospital
  • Billionaire spine surgeon buys $23.9M mansion
  • Orthopedic surgeon convicted of battery at hospital
  • Texas spine surgeon defending himself from 'Dr. Death 2.0' allegations
  • UArizona neurosurgery chair dies after motorcycle collision
  • Texas spine surgeon sued by State Farm over 'unnecessary' procedures
  • The spine tech surgeons say will explode in the next 5 years
  • Could Medtronic's spine business be the next medtech spinoff?
  • 41 'rising stars' in orthopedics
  • Orthopedic surgeon indicted in $10M telemedicine fraud scheme
  • Neurosurgeon's startup hits $1.2B valuation
  • Orthopedic surgeon fined for operating on wrong knee
  • Lawsuits build against Aetna's spine surgery coverage
  • Good news, bad news for orthopedic surgeons: 6 observations
  • Walmart's latest partnership pushes retailer into spine care
  • Texas spine surgeon's $11M verdict being appealed
  • 10 power players in orthopedics
  • Rothman Orthopaedics to become national brand, but no 'aspirations to go beyond US'
  • Sports medicine physician fired amid misconduct allegations involving patients
  • Florida hospital patients say they were injured during surgeries. Now a physician faces 350 lawsuits.
  • Top orthopedic hospital in every state: US News
  • Orthopedic surgeon allegedly exaggerated patient visits to defraud insurers
  • Orthopedic surgeon asking for misconduct charges to be dropped
  • 2 spine surgery class-action suits making headlines

    2 spine surgery class-action suits making headlines

    Alan Condon -  

    Two spine surgery class-action lawsuits have made headlines in recent months, with patients joining forces to challenge a major commercial insurer and a well-known health system in the Pacific Northwest:

    1. Renton-based Providence Health & Services Washington and two of its former neurosurgeons are accused of harming hundreds of patients by performing unnecessary spine surgeries.

    One patient alleges she cannot speak after a cervical spine surgery damaged her vocal cords, and another patient claims he cannot work because of permanent nerve damage as a result of a lumbar spine surgery. Four Washington residents are named as plaintiffs in the class-action suit, with more expected to join, attorney Bill Gilbert told Becker's

    "Although the events in question occurred at one Providence hospital in the southeast region of Washington state, we initiated a broad and comprehensive internal review of our policies, practices and procedures to ensure robust compliance with government requirements and the delivery of high-quality care," a Providence spokesperson told Becker's.

    In April, Providence agreed to pay $22.7 million to resolve allegations that it defrauded federal healthcare programs through unnecessary spine surgeries. 

    2. A 239-person class-action lawsuit related to the alleged denial of lumbar artificial disc replacement is moving forward against Aetna.

    The lawsuit, which stems from 2019, argues that Aetna improperly limits coverage for lumbar artificial disc replacement by treating the procedures as "experimental and investigational."

    Contrary to Aetna's stance, lumbar disc replacement was approved by the FDA more than 15 years ago, and most spine surgeons consider it a safe and effective procedure for lumbar disc disease. 

    "It's really indefensible at this point for [Aetna] to say that it's experimental and investigational when it's been FDA approved since 2004," Jack Zigler, MD, of Plano-based Texas Back Institute, told Becker's. "There have been almost 150,000 to 200,000 or more global implants already. So they're just posturing. Other insurance companies have tried to do the same thing, but they've had class-action lawsuits by patients who are more educated than the insurance company 'experts,' and those companies have all capitulated. They've all settled those cases on the eve of trial."

    Aetna did not respond to Becker's request for comment.

    Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

    Featured Learning Opportunities

    Featured Webinars

    Featured Podcast

    Featured Whitepapers