• 'The numbers don't lie': Endoscopy to become more prominent among next generation of spine surgeons
  • Minnesota orthopedic group hit with $111M negligence verdict
  • Orthopedic patient's death highlights potential dangers of prior authorization
  • Spine surgeon killed in Oklahoma hospital shooting
  • Neurosurgeon accepted $3.3M in illegal payments to perform spine surgeries at hospital
  • Spine surgeon gets jail time for abusing patient during hospital visit
  • Providence to pay $22.7M to settle unnecessary spine surgery allegations
  • Texas spine surgeon defending himself from 'Dr. Death 2.0' allegations
  • 'They're on really thin ice': Why 1 insurer has drawn spine surgeons' ire
  • Orthopedic surgeon must face suit in patient's death
  • Spine surgeon 1 of 9 physician billionaires on Forbes' 2022 list
  • Connecticut hospital to appeal $12.5M verdict to family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery
  • 4 spine technologies that promised more than they delivered
  • Orthopedic surgeon's health system exit steeped in controversy
  • Terminated orthopedic surgeon contracts with another New York hospital
  • Texas spine surgeon sued by State Farm over 'unnecessary' procedures
  • 22 hospitals ranked top 25 orthopedic hospitals 3+ years in a row
  • Orthopedic surgeon convicted of battery at hospital
  • UArizona neurosurgery chair dies after motorcycle collision
  • America's largest independent practices by number of spine surgeons
  • Could Medtronic's spine business be the next medtech spinoff?
  • 41 'rising stars' in orthopedics
  • Idaho orthopedic surgeon arrested for alleged misconduct at practice
  • Neurosurgeon's startup hits $1.2B valuation
  • Orthopedic surgeon indicted in $10M telemedicine fraud scheme
  • Orthopedic surgeon salaries in the 5 best, worst states for healthcare
  • New Jersey hospital must pay neurosurgeons $24.3M, appeals court rules
  • Good news, bad news for orthopedic surgeons: 6 observations
  • Why private equity is bettering orthopedics, 3 physician leaders say
  • Florida hospital patients say they were injured during surgeries. Now a physician faces 350 lawsuits.
  • Texas spine surgeon's $11M verdict being appealed
  • A Rutgers physician accused of 'ghost surgeries' will return — but with fewer responsibilities
  • Top orthopedic hospital in every state: US News
  • Rothman Orthopaedics to become national brand, but no 'aspirations to go beyond US'
  • Sports medicine physician fired amid misconduct allegations involving patients
  • Orthopedic surgeon asking for misconduct charges to be dropped
  • Unnecessary spine cases spur class action lawsuit
  • Colorado Supreme Court rejects hospital's bid to enforce $229K spine surgery bill
  • Jury finds neurosurgeon largely responsible for paralysis, awards $15.5M in damages
  • Dr. Jon Yoon performs NHL's 4th disc replacement in 7 months
  • 'The numbers don't lie': Endoscopy to become more prominent among next generation of spine surgeons
  • Neurosurgeon accepted $3.3M in illegal payments to perform spine surgeries at hospital
  • Carson Daly has 2nd spine procedure in 3 months
  • Spine surgeon steps down as CEO of biologics company
  • 2 professional athletes undergo spine surgery in a week
  • Why endoscopic spine surgery in the US lags behind Europe, Asia

    Why endoscopic spine surgery in the US lags behind Europe, Asia

    Alan Condon -  

    Endoscopic spine surgery is growing in popularity among surgeons in the U.S., but lags growth in Asia and Europe. Reimbursement shackles and a lack of training are two big hurdles affecting its adoption.

    Three spine surgeons discuss how endoscopy has benefited their practice and expand on the challenges affecting its widespread adoption in the U.S.  

    Note: Responses are lightly edited for style and clarity.

    Saqib Hasan, MD. Webster Orthopedics (Oakland, Calif.): Endoscopic spine surgery is already very popular in Asia and Europe, and more U.S. surgeons continue to adopt these techniques. Training always lags behind new technology. Only after a critical mass of spine surgeons begin utilizing endoscopic techniques will you start to see it as part of a normal spine surgical curriculum in the U.S. Many of my attendings in residency learned arthroscopic techniques after they had completed their training. Arthroscopic surgery really revolutionized orthopedic surgery because of the paradigm shift from open surgery. 

    Unfortunately, I believe early iterations of endoscopic spine surgery were not ready for prime time. The technology and techniques were not there, hence, the clinical data didn't stack well against what was tried and true. With the current picture quality and instrument improvements, endoscopic spine surgery today allows for an elegant and versatile method of treating both simple and complex spinal pathology.

    Tony Mork, MD. Endoscopic Spine Academy (Newport Beach, Calif.): There's little to no comprehensive training readily available. The endoscopic approach uses a totally different skill set than open surgery and requires a relearning of the anatomy. When you start to look at the spine through a scope, it's very different at first. Any problems encountered, for example a dural tear or bleeding, must be taken care of through the scope. This takes a little patience and a lot of practice to feel comfortable. 

    The second reason is that the reimbursement is not very good. The equipment is expensive: A diamond burr, used for bone work, can cost up to $1,900 per burr. So, if the facility isn't being reimbursed adequately, then it becomes a financial issue. Endoscopic spine surgeries are mostly outpatient procedures, so hospitals are concerned because they're not getting adequately reimbursed. Also, it's the physicians that decide between an endoscopic procedure and a fusion for a given condition. So, if the outcomes may be similar, some physicians might do a fusion because the reimbursements are so much better. 

    Raymond Gardocki, MD. Vanderbilt Health (Nashville, Tenn.): Endoscopy has been around for a while, but in the early days the optics were poor. I think there were some people pushing endoscopic spine surgery who promised it could do more than it actually can. That left a bad taste in peoples' mouths, especially in the spine community. There's a greater risk of liability in the U.S. than other countries, so people don't want to be the first person to do something. I started doing outpatient lumbar fusions in 2008, and it weighed heavily on my mind because I was basically outside the standard of care. If I had any complications, it would have been very hard to defend. But it's slowly becoming accepted now. 

    Having had that experience, I felt I could tackle the endoscopic aspect. Fundamentally, I think it's better. It's less invasive, not only intuitively, but there are studies that show inflammatory mediators are lower after an endoscopic approach than even a tubular approach. It's objectively less invasive; it allows us to do surgery on patients that are awake so you can avoid the risk of general anesthesia, which can be significant in the elderly population. You also get instant feedback — you can sometimes tell while the patient is on the table if they're better because you can ask them how their leg feels.

    Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

    Featured Webinars

    Featured Podcast

    Featured Whitepapers