Supreme Court rejects UPMC appeal in whistleblower case involving 13 neurosurgeons

Alan Condon -   Print  |

The U.S. Supreme Court on May 1 refused to hear an appeal by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in a whistleblower lawsuit against the health system and 13 neurosurgeons, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports.

The case can now move to the discovery phase in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

The lawsuit alleged that "unnecessary and overly complex surgeries" were performed to boost physician salaries and hospital revenue, beginning in 2006.

In 2012, three former UPMC employees — neurosurgeons J. William Bookwalter, MD, and Robert Sclabassi, MD, and operating room technician Anna Mitina — claimed the surgeries were performed due to UPMC's physician compensation deal, which provided bonuses to those performing the procedures.

The False Claims Act and the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act, or the Stark Law, prohibited UPMC's compensation arrangement, the plaintiffs alleged. Under the legislation, hospitals cannot bill Medicare for some services when they have financial ties to the physician involved.

The lawsuit was dismissed twice by a U.S. district judge before being reinstated by the  3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in 2019.

More articles on spine:
Geoff Martha, Kevin Lobo & more: 5 CEOs to know in the spine industry
Wright Medical inches toward sale, makes pay cuts due to pandemic: 5 updates
How COVID-19 has affected Medtronic, Stryker, Johnson & Johnson's shares over the last month

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.

Featured Webinars

Featured Whitepapers