5-Year Spinal Disc Replacement Data is In: How it Compares With Spinal Fusion

A recent study of five year data for patients who underwent cervical total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion show a five-fold difference in reoperation rates, according to a study published in Spine.

Advertisement

Sign up for our FREE Spine E-Weekly for more coverage like this sent to your inbox!

Rick B. Delamarter, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, and Jack Zigler, MD, of Texas Back Institute in Plano, were listed as study authors. The study included 209 patients who received either total cervical disc replacement with the ProDisc-C or ACDF at 13 different treatment sites, and researchers considered a surgical intervention at any level after the initial procedure a reoperation.

Here are five things to know about the results:

•    After five years, patients who underwent TDR had a 97.1 percent probability of no secondary procedures, compared with 85.5 percent for ACDF patients.
•    No reoperations in TDR patients were due to implant breakage or device failure.
•    Pseudarthrosis was the most common reason for reoperation at the index level among ACDF patients.
•    Recurrent neck pain and/or arm pain was the most common reason for reoperation at the adjacent level for both groups.
•    Only 2.9 percent of TDR patients had reoperations within five years of the initial surgery, compared with 14.5 percent of the ACDF patients.

More Articles on Spine Surgery:

6 Ways to Increase Spine Practice Profits

5 Quick Ways to Grow Spine Surgeon Practices

6 Trends for Successful Spine Practice Models of the Future

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement

Comments are closed.