Study authors systematically reviewed 32 articles on robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement. Here are five study findings:
1. Robotic-assisted intrapedicular screw placement accuracy was comparable, if not superior, to freehand spine surgery.
2. Compared to conventional freehand surgery, robotic-assisted surgery had longer operative time.
3. Radiation exposure appeared to be variable between different studies. Radiation time decreased in the robot arm as the total number of robotic cases increased, suggesting a learning curve effect.
4. Multilevel procedures tended to result in earlier discharge in patients undergoing robotic spine surgery.
5. Surgeons should be mindful of confirming robotic-assisted screw trajectory, study authors conclude, as drilling pathways have been demonstrated to be altered by soft tissue pressures, forceful surgical application and bony surface skiving.
More articles on spine:
Virginia neurosurgeon uses ERAS to fight opioid epidemic
Neurosurgeon joins Samaritan Health Services
The HSS Spine Care Model
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.
