2-level disc replacement vs. ACDF: Which sees fewer readmissions?

Advertisement

Patients having two-level cervical disc replacement tended to have fewer postoperative complications compared to those having two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, according to a study published in the April 15 edition of Spine.

Researchers gathered data for two-level cervical disc replacement and ACDF patients using the PearlDiver M165Ortho database and matched the cohorts 1 to1 based on age, sex and Elixhauser comorbidity index scores. There were 4,224 patients in each study group.

Relative to patients having two-level ACDF, patients who had two-level cervical disc replacement saw significantly lower odds of 90-day dysphagia. The median 90-day cost of care was greater for the ACDF patients.

The study concluded that “patients undergoing two-level CDA were found to have significantly lower odds of 90-day readmissions and minor adverse events such as dysphagia, while rates of major adverse events including pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis or sepsis, were comparable between the groups. Further, patients undergoing CDA had lower cost of overall care, but no difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation. Thus, it may be appropriate to further consider CDA when two-level surgery is pursued.”

At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Spine

Advertisement