• Family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery wins $35M verdict against hospital
  • Orthopedic surgeon wins $20M verdict against Johnson & Johnson
  • Minnesota orthopedic group hit with $111M negligence verdict
  • Orthopedic patient's death highlights potential dangers of prior authorization
  • Spine surgeon's video hits 1 million views on TikTok
  • Spine surgeon killed in Oklahoma hospital shooting
  • Spine surgeon owes $17M to paralyzed patient
  • Providence to pay $22.7M to settle unnecessary spine surgery allegations
  • Spine surgeon gets jail time for abusing patient during hospital visit
  • 'They're on really thin ice': Why 1 insurer has drawn spine surgeons' ire
  • Connecticut hospital to appeal $12.5M verdict to family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery
  • Orthopedic surgeon must face suit in patient's death
  • Spine surgeon 1 of 9 physician billionaires on Forbes' 2022 list
  • 23 spine device companies to watch in 2022
  • 4 spine technologies that promised more than they delivered
  • Orthopedic surgeon salary vs. average household income in each state
  • Orthopedic surgeon's health system exit steeped in controversy
  • Terminated orthopedic surgeon contracts with another New York hospital
  • Orthopedic surgeon convicted of battery at hospital
  • Billionaire spine surgeon buys $23.9M mansion
  • UArizona neurosurgery chair dies after motorcycle collision
  • Texas spine surgeon sued by State Farm over 'unnecessary' procedures
  • The spine tech surgeons say will explode in the next 5 years
  • Could Medtronic's spine business be the next medtech spinoff?
  • Ex-NFL player gets 5 years in prison for $2.9M healthcare fraud scheme
  • 41 'rising stars' in orthopedics
  • Orthopedic surgeon indicted in $10M telemedicine fraud scheme
  • Neurosurgeon's startup hits $1.2B valuation
  • Orthopedic surgeon fined for operating on wrong knee
  • Lawsuits build against Aetna's spine surgery coverage
  • Good news, bad news for orthopedic surgeons: 6 observations
  • Former spine surgeon owes $13M to 2 women over unnecessary procedures
  • Walmart's latest partnership pushes retailer into spine care
  • Texas spine surgeon's $11M verdict being appealed
  • 10 power players in orthopedics
  • Rothman Orthopaedics to become national brand, but no 'aspirations to go beyond US'
  • Sports medicine physician fired amid misconduct allegations involving patients
  • Orthopedic surgeon allegedly exaggerated patient visits to defraud insurers
  • Top orthopedic hospital in every state: US News
  • Orthopedic surgeon asking for misconduct charges to be dropped
  • How Medtronic is strengthening its spine business
  • $85M settlement reached in spinal cord stimulation lawsuits
  • Medtronic's next-gen predictive spine surgery model cleared
  • ZimVie's pediatric scoliosis device gets coverage by Anthem BCBS
  • Spinal fusion alternative device reaches FDA milestone
  • The spine surgery devices, techniques that won't stand the test of time

    The spine surgery devices, techniques that won't stand the test of time

    Laura Dyrda -  

    Nine spine surgeons discuss the technology and techniques that will fade over the next few years, and factors driving the disappearance.

    Q: What do you think will fade or disappear from the spine field over the next few years?

    Mitchell Levine, MD. Lenox Hill Hospital (New York City): Interventions for focal back pain and neck pain without neurological involvement are going to trend down. Insurance companies are tightening their criteria for approving fusion surgeries and evidence-based care will be standard. This increased scrutiny on efficacy will be brought to bear on all aspects of spine care, including pain management and physical therapy as well. The overuse of epidural steroids and ablative procedures in spinal stenosis treatment is already being evaluated.

    Nigel Price, MD. Children's Mercy Kansas City (Mo.): Several value-driven practices are changing the outcomes. We will see fewer infections, less need for transfusions, early mobilization and earlier discharges from the inpatient side. We will hopefully make better decisions in terms of preoperative planning and execution so avoidable complications necessitating revision surgery will be reduced. Collaboration across many institutions will help refine technique through sharing of data. There will be fewer spine fusions for deformity in the younger age group as techniques and technologies for doing guided growth will encourage more fusionless surgery.

    Jeffrey Cantor, MD. Cantor Spine Institute (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.): Traditional bone cutting tools are the easiest old technology to replace.

    Eugene Koh, MD, PhD. University of Maryland School of Medicine (Baltimore): Currently, insurance companies are collecting data on each individual surgeon, including expense for each individual procedure (for example, the cost for a single-level ACDF). Certain insurance companies are financially incentivizing primary care physicians to refer to the least expensive surgeons. As they accumulate more data, including outcomes data, the insurance companies would dictate the procedure or surgeon with the lowest revision rate. Numerous reports have demonstrated interspinous devices for lumbar spinal stenosis have poor outcomes and a high re-operation rate. Insurance companies will make it more and more difficult for surgeons to justify placing these implants or any devices that have a high revision rate.

    Andrew Cordover, MD. Andrews Sorts Medicine & Orthopaedic Center (Birmingham, Ala.): I have a concern with the over-reliance on technology and the disappearance of knowledge of basic, technical surgical principles. The burden will fall on teaching institutions to make sure that doesn't happen as image guidance and new biologics (which may allow for suboptimal surgical technique) gain acceptance.

    Avery Jackson, MD. Michigan Neurosurgical Institute (Grand Blanc): I think interbody spinous devices will eventually fade. I think halo fixation will eventually fade.

    Michael Goldsmith, MD. The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics (Bethesda, Md.): Hopefully revision surgery for pseudarthrosis will be less prevalent in the coming years. As our implants and techniques become better and our adjuncts to bone grafts become more powerful through advancement in biologics, I would expect to see fusion rates rise. Revision surgery is extremely costly and has higher complication rates than index fusions, so the goal is to avoid reoperation to benefit both the patient and health system.

    One concern I have, which is a bleak prediction, is that innovation may decrease as well. In an effort to save money, many hospitals, in particular the larger health systems, are moving to one or two vendor systems which drives out smaller companies and may have the downstream effect of diminishing innovation. Oftentimes smaller companies have the ability to be more innovative either because they were created around a new technology or in order to differentiate themselves. We need to continue to encourage true innovation at the ground level by supporting all technology, not just from the big companies.

    Robert Jackson, MD. Orange County Neurosurgical Associates (Laguna Hills, Calif.): Narcotic consumption will decrease over the next five years as practitioners and public become more aware of the dangers.

    To participate in future Becker's Q&As, contact Laura Dyrda at ldyrda@beckershealthcare.com

    For a deeper dive into the future of spine, attend the Becker's 17th Annual Future of Spine + Spine, Orthopedic & Pain Management-Driven ASC in Chicago, June 13-5, 2019. Click here to learn more and register.

     

    Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

    Featured Learning Opportunities

    Featured Webinars

    Featured Podcast

    Featured Whitepapers