How 4 possible Medicare modifications affect beneficiaries: Spending increases & reductions

The proposals to modify Medicare will have varying degrees of impact on spending for beneficiaries; while some would pay less, others would pay more depending on the features in each option:

Advertisement

• Option 1: A single $650 deductible for Medicare Part A and Part B, modify cost-sharing requirements, add $6,700 annual cost-sharing limit to Medicare and limit the extent Medigap plans could cover the deductible
• Option 2: Reducing the deductible to $400 and the cost-sharing limit to $4,000
• Option 3: Provide some low-income beneficiaries with full Medicare cost-sharing subsidies under the modified benefit design
• Option 4: Income-relating the deductible and cost-sharing limit

 

A Kaiser Family Foundation report shows the Option 1 would produce the greatest federal savings, at $5.5 billion, but only have $0.7 billion in savings for beneficiaries and expose more than 3 million low-income beneficiaries to higher out-of-pocket costs. The second option would have more financial protections and savings for beneficiaries, but federal spending would increase.

 

Here is how each plan would impact beneficiaries:

 

1. Option 1 — 35 percent of beneficiaries would see OOP spending increase, 25 percent would have no or nominal change and 40 percent would see OOP spending reduction.

 

2. Option 2 — 25 percent of beneficiaries would see OOP spending increase, 35 percent would have no or nominal change and 40 percent would see OOP spending reduction.

 

3. Option 3 — 32 percent of beneficiaries would see OOP spending increase, 24 percent would have no or nominal change and 44 percent would see OOP spending reduction.

 

4. Option 4 — 35 percent of beneficiaries would see OOP spending increase, 44 percent would have no or nominal change and 21 percent would see OOP spending reduction.

 

The report concludes “adding a cost-sharing limit would provide valuable financial protection to a relatively small share of the Medicare population that incurs catastrophic expenses in any given year, although a larger share of beneficiaries would be helped by this provision over multiple years.” At the same time, the opposition reduce the impact of out-of-pocket spending could produce lower federal savings or increase federal spending.

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Practice Management

Advertisement

Comments are closed.