Comparing 3D imaging, navigation systems for spine surgery: 5 things to know

A new study published in Clinical Spine Surgery compares two different 3D C-arms for intraoperative imaging and navigation during minimally invasive spine surgery.

Advertisement

 

The study examines the Siremobile Iso-C 3D from Siemens and Vision FD Vario 3D from Ziehm. The systems orbit around the patient to provide 3D imaging from multiple image sets. The study authors found:

 

1. The Vision FD Vario 3D was quicker, performing an elliptical scanning arc of 135 degrees in 64 seconds; the Siremobile Iso-C 3D took 128 seconds for a 190-degree scan.

 

2. Five surgeons compared the images and found the Vision FD Vario 3D was easier to maneuver in the OR; the Siremobile Iso-C 3D was described as “bulky.”

 

3. The Siremobil Iso-CC had higher image quality scores in all categories.

 

4. For lumbar 3D scans, the Vision FD Vario 3D had fewer artifacts.

 

5. The study authors concluded, “The Siremobile Iso-C 3D provides high-quality 3D scans in slender spine regions, whereas the Vision FD Vario 3D appears to have advantages in the lumbar spine.”

 

More articles on minimally invasive spine surgery:

8 trends in spine, orthopedics and ASCs over the next 5 years

Does minimally invasive technology improve lumbar fusion outcomes?

5 powerhouse companies in the global MIS spine market

At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Uncategorized

Advertisement

Comments are closed.