Here are five things to know:
1. Researchers evaluated the following:
- Physician-rating sites’ details
- Differences between physician-rating sites and the Consensus Core
- Published patient experience across various sites
- Search rankings among the sites
- Differences between academic versus non-academic and arthroplasty versus non-arthroplasty surgeons
2. Data pertaining to 506 staff surgeons across 10 academic and non-academic affiliated hospitals yielded 27,792 patient-generated ratings and reviews for 1,404 orthopedists.
3. Composite orthopedic surgeon rating was 4.1 out of 5.
4. No physician-rating site contained all features of the Consensus Core.
5. Surgeons are marketed and promoted better on institution-produced sites, according to the report.
More articles on practice management:
Surgeon honored by US Military and Wuesthoff Hospital Melbourne — 4 notes
Healthcare Administrative Partners launch MIPS assistance services — 5 details
Midtown Outpatient Surgery Center implements Surgical Notes’ ASC Cloud EHR — 5 takeaways
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.
