“Some members [of Congress] are worried deficit-wary voters could make them pay a steep price at the polls,” The Hill said.
The House passed a five-year fee-fix by a wide margin of 243-183 votes last year but the measure was defeated in the Senate, where 60 votes were needed. Ever since, the measure’s $88.5 billion price tag has given both houses of Congress pause, as they worry about tough re-election battles in the fall.
This year alone, Congress passed three short-term patches, two of which arrived after the deadline. Now federal lawmakers find themselves once again weighing a short-term Band-Aid versus a five-year fix.
“We’re still in discussions about what will be in this bill,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the assistant to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). “The most important thing is to get off this month-to-month approach.”
The five-year fix would be exempt from Congress’ “pay-go” law, which requires budget offsets to pay for big-ticket bills. Still, lawmakers such as Rep. John Tanner (D-Tenn.) and Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) have raised concerns about the cost.
Sen. Conrad said his support of the five-year fix was conditional on passage of some cost-saving policies he is proposing, such as eliminating the alternative minimum tax for middle-class taxpayers.
Read the Hill’s report on the physician fee fix.
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
