The hospital submitted its request to determine whether the proposed arrangement would violate the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.
Under the arrangement, the hospital would offer free access to the interface to all physicians who requested it. Those providers would then use the interface to transmit orders for laboratory and diagnostic services from the hospital and to receive the results of those services.
Additionally, the hospital would also provide support services necessary to maintain the interface, such as software updates. Those services would be provided by a contractor. Physicians would still be required to acquire, install and maintain the electronic medical record that allows them to communicate with the hospital through the interface.
The OIG concluded the hospital’s proposed arrangement would not generate prohibited kickbacks under the federal statute.
“Under the proposed arrangement, interface access would have no independent value to the physicians apart from the services the requestor provides,” according to the OIG opinion. “Accordingly, we conclude that the proposed arrangement, would not, under these particular facts, implicate the antikickback statute.”
More Articles on the Antikickback Statute:
OIG’s Latest Advisory Opinion Offers Guidance on Compliant Call Coverage Compensation Plans
Per Diem Call Coverage and the Anti-Kickback Statute: What is Compliant?
7 Things Hospitals Should Know About Professional Services Agreements
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.