Ask Spine Surgeons is a weekly series of questions posed to spine surgeons around the country about clinical, business and policy issues affecting spine care. We invite all spine surgeon and specialist responses. Next week's question: What is the number one thing spine practices should look for in electronic medical records?
lease send responses to Laura Miller at firstname.lastname@example.org by Thursday, Nov. 21, at 5 p.m. CST.
Q: What regulations cause the most headaches at your spine practice?
A. Nick Shamie, MD, American College of Spine Surgery President: I am getting more denials for advanced imaging and surgeries than ever before. This takes time away from patient care and is disruptive. I spend time in the middle of my day speaking to payor representatives who are physicians or ancillary care providers who have very little to no experience in spinal disorders. It takes longer to try and explain a condition to these individuals who have limited training in the field of spine care. These are regulatory burdens than are placed on us by the payors and can create inefficiencies and are counterproductive.
One suggestion would be to have spine specialists review authorization requests; this would avoid unnecessary denials and would allow us to focus our efforts on patient care. Also to have these representatives available before and after the regular working hours so we don't have to take time away from our patients.
Jeffrey Wang, MD, UCLA Spine Center: The documentation issues and the requirements are probably the biggest headache. The arbitrary decision that certain things in a review of systems that have to be mentioned, even if they are negative and have nothing to do with the acute problem, has been a big problem. We find physicians in our practice charging less for their services just because of concerns with following specific documentation rules that appear to be quite arbitrary.
More Articles on Spine Surgeons:
7 Thoughts on How President Barack Obama's Re-Election Impacts Spine Surgery
10 Ways to Destroy Spine Practice Marketing
Goals & Priorities for Spine Surgeons Post Healthcare Reform: Q&A With NASS President Dr. Charles Mick
What Regulations Cause the Biggest Headaches for Spine Surgeons? FeaturedWritten by Laura Dyrda | Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:04
Two spine surgeons discuss the regulations that cause the biggest headaches at their practices.Last modified on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:09
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2016. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.
Most Read - Spine
- Dr. Robert Blok joins Laser Spine Institute — 4 key points
- Does workers' compensation matter for cervical disc arthroplasty outcomes? 6 key notes
- The growth of outpatient spine — 9 Key Points
- Carilion Clinic opens $32M Institute for Orthopaedics and Neurosciences: 5 things to know
- Total lumbar disc replacement vs. lumbar fusion: 5 key notes on revision rates
Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months
- Cleveland Clinic standardizes to 2 implant vendors, at least one orthopedic surgeon out
- 22 minimally invasive spine devices to know
- 5 things to know about physician assistant pay
- Becker's Spine Review Channels
- Did this orthopedic surgeon let his PA perform surgery? Dr. Munir Uwaydah faces conspiracy, $150M fraud & aggravated mayhem charges: 6 key notes
- Surface technology for spine devices: Key trends & concepts
- Orthopedic surgeon Dr. Michael Reilly's whistleblower lawsuit results in $69M+ penalty for Broward Health — 7 things to know
- 15 things to know about physician shortages
- 334 spine surgeons to know — 2016
- Current annual & hourly salary rates for orthopedic surgeons: 8 statistics
- Dr. Richard Rooney pleads guilty to undisclosed financial interest, sentenced to prison: 5 things to know
- Rumors of a Stryker acquisition of Smith & Nephew swirl once again: 6 key notes
- Dr. Sang-Ho Lee awarded Parviz Kambin award for endoscopic spine surgery at NASS meeting: 5 highlights
- Physician stabbed in Virginia leaving clinic — Attacker wanted more pain meds
- Stryker recalls 16k+ units of orthopedic products: 5 takeaways
- The future of private practice: Key thoughts from OrthoCarolina CEO Dr. Daniel Murrey
- 5 trends putting the squeeze on surgical practices
- MIS, stem cells, biologics & more: What excites spine surgeons most about the current landscape?
- Google and Johnson & Johnson to form new surgical company — 4 highlights
- Transparency in healthcare can work today — Hoag Orthopedic Institute proves it
- Global spine surgery device market seeing double-digit growth: 5 key points
- Drs. Troy Caron, Raj Kakarlapudi, Jeff Martin join Laser Spine's surgery centers: 5 key points
- 8 surprising topics your spine patients are researching
- The theory behind Geisinger's spine surgery refund
- The ICD-10 deadline is almost upon us — Are spine surgeons ready?
- 5 key trends on Massachusetts physician pay — And what it means for US physicians
- Q2 financials: 150 things to know about NuVasive, Stryker, J&J Orthopedics & more
- 5 huge reputation management mistakes for surgeons
- 5 trends in the medical tourism market
- 10 statistics on neurosurgeon salaries & bonuses
- 10 key notes on the 2016 CMS physician fee schedule
- Stryker director sells 18k shares, following Smith & Nephew acquisition rumors: 7 points
- Intersecting care of spine pain specialists & spine surgeons: Drs. Heidi Prather & Scott Glaser talk pain
- Rothman Institute merges with OrthopaediCare; adds 17 physicians: 4 things to know
- Did Loma Linda's orthopedic device rep-less strategy work? 5 things to know
- Alphatec Spine, LDR, Globus Medical & more — 21 key notes
- Population health on a budget: How one orthopedic surgeon succeeded in Chicago's most impoverished neighborhoods
- Is PEEK cost-effective for spinal surgery? 5 things to know
- 32 hospitals to pay $28M in spine surgery false claims settlement: 5 things to know
- ProDisc-C vs. spinal fusion: Which has better results? 5 key notes