Here Dr. Mick expounds upon his goals and vision for the organization, as well as how NASS will cope with changes in the spinal care industry.
Q: What will be the top priority for NASS next year?
Dr. Charles Mick: There are many important issues facing the spine community. The one we've heard about most strongly from members is defining insurance coverage policies for spine care. NASS will be working this year to define and distribute to the members and insurance carriers reasonable and evidence-based coverage policies for spine care. We've created a task force that will be selecting between 10 and 20 common spine conditions and then developing what we believe are reasonable coverage policies for those conditions, based upon reviews of evidence.
Q: What further goals will your organization pursue?
CM: We also want our members to be able to measure how the treatments that they recommend are doing. We need to start collecting outcome data, not only in research settings, but in daily care. Individual physicians need to be able to track and measure their own outcomes. Then we can set standards, identify shortcomings and develop ways to improve care.
A diagnosis based spine registry has been under development at NASS for the past two years. The pilot program we anticipate will be starting in December or early next year. An important goal is to complete the pilot study and then to expand the registry to the members. Insurance carriers are demanding that physicians demonstrate they can achieve good outcomes for the interventions they are recommending. NASS will work to define top quality high value care, advocate for its coverage and make available to the members a registry to measure the results.
Q: What are some challenges facing NASS and the spine industry?
CM: There are several challenges. One is defining high quality and high value care. We then have to demonstrate which treatments work and that they are cost-effective.
[A second challenge] relates to the recent presidential election. We need to learn how best to coordinate the different aspects of spine care as we create integrated delivery systems. This will require specialists in spine care to increasingly interact with primary care physicians and ancillary providers. We have to discover how best to do this.
Q: What type of advocacy efforts will NASS coordinate?
CM: We will be advocating for coverage from insurance companies for care proven to be effective. We will also be speak out against care for which we don’t have good evidence. An example would be prolonged bed rest for the treatment of back pain. We know that this is poor treatment so we will advocate against this approach and for early mobilization.
Also, consider MRIs or CAT scans inappropriately ordered within the first few weeks of the onset of low back pain in absence of warning signs for dangerous conditions. [Those tests] are important when appropriate, but they can be over used. We want to advocate for appropriate coverage and speak out against inappropriate care. I think the physician community has been hesitant to speak out against [MRI] overuse. We need to do a better job.
For certain tests and therapies for which we have good evidence, we need to work with insurance companies and advocate for coverage and reasonable payment. For example, surgery for spinal stenosis. We know that it is an excellent intervention. We know it works well, and it has good value. We can advocate very strongly for it.
Q: How will President Obama's reelection impact your field?
CM: It is time for all stakeholders in health care to look beyond self interests and to work together and implement the Democratic experiment in healthcare reform. Nobody knows the end result, but all of us know that healthcare reform is needed. We need to improve care coordination and quality, and we need to reduce costs. The Democrats have won, and we have been given a message that the public wants to move forward with their plan.
Some aspects of the ACA are superb. For example, giving insurance to everybody, not being able to take insurance away if you get sick and being able to move from job to job and take your insurance with you. There are other aspects that will need to be modified and improved, for example the Independent Payment Advisory Board.
Q: How will your past experience work toward your new position at NASS?
CM: I've been involved in spine care and in private practice for 25 years and have a tremendous amount of experience with patients, what they need and what is required to deliver high quality care. My expertise at NASS has been in healthcare policy, including coding, insurance coverage, reimbursement, advocacy and defining quality and value-based spine care. These are top priorities for our patients and members.
I'm looking forward to working with the [NASS] staff and volunteer leadership. Everyone at NASS brings a unique perspective to the team. The society by its nature includes spine care professionals from multiple disciplines. Each of these individuals will need increasingly to work together to define, coordinate, deliver, measure and improve care. This is exactly what our patients need us to do.
More Articles on Spine:
5 Points of Value Primary Spine Practitioners Bring to Spine Care
The Spine Institute in Colorado to Build ASC
Spine Surgery Associates Teams Up With Parkridge Medical Group
Goals & Priorities for Spine Surgeons Post Healthcare Reform: Q&A With NASS President Dr. Charles Mick FeaturedWritten by Heather Linder | Friday, 09 November 2012 14:56
At the North American Spine Society's annual meeting in October, Charles Mick, MD, was named president for the next year. Dr. Mick is a board-certified orthopedic surgeon who has been a member of NASS for 25 years. He practices at Pioneer Spine and Sports Physicians in Northampton, Mass., and is also a member of the Advocacy and Rehabilitation Interventional and Medical Spine Committees.
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2016. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.
Most Read - Spine
- Dr. Robert Blok joins Laser Spine Institute — 4 key points
- Orthopedics and spine — 6 trends for 2016
- Does workers' compensation matter for cervical disc arthroplasty outcomes? 6 key notes
- NY spine surgeries migrating to high-volume centers — 5 key points
- 8 things for spine surgeons to know for Thursday — Jan. 14, 2016
Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months
- Cleveland Clinic standardizes to 2 implant vendors, at least one orthopedic surgeon out
- 22 minimally invasive spine devices to know
- 5 things to know about physician assistant pay
- Becker's Spine Review Channels
- Did this orthopedic surgeon let his PA perform surgery? Dr. Munir Uwaydah faces conspiracy, $150M fraud & aggravated mayhem charges: 6 key notes
- Surface technology for spine devices: Key trends & concepts
- Orthopedic surgeon Dr. Michael Reilly's whistleblower lawsuit results in $69M+ penalty for Broward Health — 7 things to know
- 15 things to know about physician shortages
- Current annual & hourly salary rates for orthopedic surgeons: 8 statistics
- 334 spine surgeons to know — 2016
- Dr. Sang-Ho Lee awarded Parviz Kambin award for endoscopic spine surgery at NASS meeting: 5 highlights
- Dr. Richard Rooney pleads guilty to undisclosed financial interest, sentenced to prison: 5 things to know
- Physician stabbed in Virginia leaving clinic — Attacker wanted more pain meds
- Rumors of a Stryker acquisition of Smith & Nephew swirl once again: 6 key notes
- Stryker recalls 16k+ units of orthopedic products: 5 takeaways
- The future of private practice: Key thoughts from OrthoCarolina CEO Dr. Daniel Murrey
- 5 trends putting the squeeze on surgical practices
- MIS, stem cells, biologics & more: What excites spine surgeons most about the current landscape?
- Transparency in healthcare can work today — Hoag Orthopedic Institute proves it
- Drs. Troy Caron, Raj Kakarlapudi, Jeff Martin join Laser Spine's surgery centers: 5 key points
- Google and Johnson & Johnson to form new surgical company — 4 highlights
- Global spine surgery device market seeing double-digit growth: 5 key points
- The theory behind Geisinger's spine surgery refund
- 8 surprising topics your spine patients are researching
- The ICD-10 deadline is almost upon us — Are spine surgeons ready?
- 5 key trends on Massachusetts physician pay — And what it means for US physicians
- 5 huge reputation management mistakes for surgeons
- Q2 financials: 150 things to know about NuVasive, Stryker, J&J Orthopedics & more
- 5 trends in the medical tourism market
- 10 statistics on neurosurgeon salaries & bonuses
- 10 key notes on the 2016 CMS physician fee schedule
- Stryker director sells 18k shares, following Smith & Nephew acquisition rumors: 7 points
- Intersecting care of spine pain specialists & spine surgeons: Drs. Heidi Prather & Scott Glaser talk pain
- Rothman Institute merges with OrthopaediCare; adds 17 physicians: 4 things to know
- Did Loma Linda's orthopedic device rep-less strategy work? 5 things to know
- Can orthopedic surgeons withstand the changing value-based healthcare system?
- Alphatec Spine, LDR, Globus Medical & more — 21 key notes
- Population health on a budget: How one orthopedic surgeon succeeded in Chicago's most impoverished neighborhoods
- Is PEEK cost-effective for spinal surgery? 5 things to know
- 32 hospitals to pay $28M in spine surgery false claims settlement: 5 things to know