The RPT provides significant income tax savings, personal asset protection and death benefit coverage on a discriminatory, pre-tax basis. It is an appealing strategy when considering a typical host of obstacles faced by current business owners and operators in the medical care industry today, namely:
• Increased liability concerns
• Increased income tax rates looming on the horizon
• Inability to save enough through Qualified Plans
Benefits of the RPT include:
• Up to 70 percent annual income tax savings to participants
• Tax deferred growth of plan assets
• Contributions are 100 percent deductible to employers
• Creditor protection
• Partners can individually choose their level of participation, or choose not to participate at all
• Not subject to Qualified Plan participation requirements
• Death benefit protection
• Enhanced returns on conservative plan assets
How does an RPT work?
Fully tax-deductible contributions are made by the business to an RPT for each participant. The entire contribution is used to fund a whole life insurance policy on each participant, with approximately 30 percent of the contributions treated as current taxable income and the remaining 70 percent not subject to tax.
Contributions must be made each year that the trust is in existence. There is no ability to defer or accelerate contributions. Failure to make the annual contribution causes both the whole life policy to lapse and the surrender proceeds within the trust to be given to a pre-selected charity. This risk of forfeiture is a critical plan provision and causes many plan participants to scale back their planned contributions.
While the trust is intact, whole life cash values are protected from creditors and grow without being subject to income tax. If death occurs, the death benefit is paid to a named trust beneficiary and is not subject to estate or income taxes.
The trust has a scheduled period of five years and can be extended by the participant. At termination the participant receives the whole life policy. A portion of the cash value will be subject to taxation, with a longer trust period resulting in reduced taxes. A non-taxable policy disbursement can be made at the participants' option to cover this tax cost. Once the policy, which at this point will require no additional funding, is in the participants' hands a number of options exist, among them distributing non-taxable funds and / or maintaining insurance coverage.
The RPT is available to individuals with earned income, whether from a C-Corp, S-Corp, or partnership. Because an RPT is not a Qualified Plan participation limits and tests do not apply. Individual participants can select their own level of contribution, regardless of what other participants contribute.
If you would like to gain additional information, have questions, learn more about RPT, or set up a time to meet with our professional consultants and advisors, please contact Joseph Resnick of JR KATZ at firstname.lastname@example.org, or call 847-564-8430.
Long-Term Asset Accumulation Strategy: Restricted Property TrustWritten by Joseph Resnick & Steve Schaumberger of JR KATZ | Wednesday, 23 November 2011 20:50
At the 18th Annual Ambulatory Surgery Centers Conference in Chicago we had the pleasure of presenting the Restricted Property Trust (RPT) a tax-favored, long-term asset accumulation strategy. In case you missed our presentation, here is a brief summary of the RPT, which we have found has a strong appeal to business owners and physician/doctor groups.
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2017. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.
Most Read - Improving Profits
- Medicare episode expenditures for joint replacement decline 20.8% following CJR: 5 study insights
- Low back, neck pain spending increases by $57.2B over 18 years: 5 things to know
- 5 key notes on medical malpractice
- 10 most popular orthopedic stories of 2016
- OrthoArizona-Arizona Orthopaedic Associates opens 2 new locations: 5 key notes
Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months
- 20 new MIS spine devices in 2016
- 44 MIS spine devices to know | 2016
- Police investigate death of American Spine Center's physician accused in federal kickback scheme: 6 things to know
- Suicide likely cause of Dr. Sandeep Sherlekar's death, police report shows: 6 things to know
- 12 statistics on social media's presence in the healthcare space
- 38 female spine surgeon leaders to know
- Dr. Gregory Sherr sues HealthEast, CentraCare & 6 neurosurgeons for allegedly ruining his reputation & career — 6 things to know
- US News & World Report: Top 10 hospitals for orthopedics
- Oregon spine surgeon implicated in $22M lawsuit for paralyzing patient with dropped instrument: 5 things to know
- 7 things to know about Mazor Robotics & Medtronic's plans to roll out Mazor X
- 11 highest-paying states for orthopedic surgeons: New Jersey tops the list at $494.5k
- Beyond the implant — DePuy Synthes pushes innovation inside & out of the OR
- 21 statistics and facts for orthopedic surgeons — compensation, net worth and more
- The state of minimally invasive spine surgery: Dr. Frank Phillips on devices, payment & outpatient ASCs
- Are Stryker's hip implants about to be recalled?
- Understanding the Impact of the CMS 2017 ASC Payment Rule on Spine Procedures
- 19 more things to know about orthopedic bundled payments — September 2016
- Trump or Hillary? The physicians have voted
- 5 trends for orthopedic surgeons to watch in 2017
- 15 spine surgeons discuss techniques revolutionizing spine care
- FDA regulation, insurance coverage: Dr. Raj N. Sureja talks challenges in regenerative medicine
- Do you know what patients really care about when choosing a spine surgeon?
- Robotics is here to stay — Drs. Kornelis Poelstra & Dennis Devito on working with Mazor technology
- Medtronic, SeaSpine, Zimmer Biomet & more: 17 key notes
- 3 orthopedic clinics to pay $2.39M to settle False Claims Act allegations: 5 things to know
- 33 of the largest orthopedic groups in the US by number of physicians
- 10 thoughts and statistics on medical malpractice claims against orthopedists
- UCLA pays $8.5M to settle 2 lawsuits after undisclosed spine surgeon relationship with Medtronic: 5 key notes
- 4 of the most pressing challenges orthopedic surgeons face in 2017
- 5 largest orthopedic companies have 61% of market share
- What not to wear — Physician's attire elicits mixed responses in outpatient orthopedic centers
- 6 spine physicians ranked #1 on Google - 2016
- 8 spine codes CMS proposes for ASC coverage in 2017
- Dr. Robert Watkins performs spine surgery on Patriots' Rob Gronkowski
- Orthopedic residency programs violate Match Code of Conduct: 6 things to know
- 8 biggest stories in 2016's spine market — Acquisitions, lawsuits, bundled payments & more
- The science of healthcare delivery: 10 thoughts on the future structure of healthcare organizations
- Dr. Jonathan Falakassa joins Southern California Orthopedic Institute: 5 key notes
- The role of the surgical microscope in modern MIS spine — Drs. K.D. Riew, Michael Mayer, Roger Härtl & Mohd Hisam Muhamad Ariffin share their experiences
- Beyond oral opioids — Spinal cord stimulators, targeted drug delivery & the future of pain management