PDP Holdings is a company that works with surgeons, hospitals and device manufacturers to provide high quality implants at a lower cost. Their business model allows surgeons to select implants — oftentimes from the same suppliers they already use in the operating room — and purchase them directly from the manufacturer, cutting out the distributor and sales rep as the "middle men" in the equation.
Here are three benefits of a PDP's direct purchase implant model:
1. Hospital benefits. Joseph Truhe, senior vice president and general counsel for PDP Holdings, says hospitals can save 10 to 20 percent or more, on these surgical devices, even for the identical supplier. In one case, the company was able to save a Texas hospital 40 percent on devices on a DRG comparison, accounting for the elimination of "upselling" in the OR and the use of non-premium equivalents. Such savings are particularly attractive if the hospital is participating in accountable care organizations, bundled payments or another type of risk-sharing arrangement to lower costs and provide better care
2. Surgeon benefits. Within the company's model, surgeons partner with PDP to lower supply chain costs and control physician preference item decisions. In return, they share in the savings generated by the model. Mr. Truhe says that since physicians take real risk, maintain independence from manufacturers, and operate under strict compliance requirements, this type of venture complies with current regulatory guidance from the Office of the Inspector General.
3. Device company benefits. PDP holds an event where device companies can display their products and invites participating surgeons to examine their options and then make decisions about which devices to use. This access to surgeons is highly sought after and shows that device companies are willing to partner with physicians in their cost-cutting initiatives going forward.
Orthopedic & Spine Industry Company to Know: PDP HoldingsWritten by Laura Dyrda | Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:39
One of the biggest expenses in orthopedic and spine surgery is device and implant costs. Providers often pay a premium for name-brand products, many of which are actually commodities, and the sales representatives that come along with them. However, downward pressure on reimbursement is forcing providers to examine healthcare costs and cut those costs wherever necessary to provide true value-based healthcare.
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2017. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.
- What Stryker CEO Kevin Lobo said on CNBC: 7 key quotes on healthcare, business & the future
- 5 reasons why Medtronic is poised for growth in the next 5 years, despite a disappointing Q2
- 10 most popular device and implant stories of 2016
- How 8 large orthopedic, spine device companies are doing financially
- 6 things to know about nanotechnology in healthcare
Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months
- 20 new MIS spine devices in 2016
- 44 MIS spine devices to know | 2016
- Police investigate death of American Spine Center's physician accused in federal kickback scheme: 6 things to know
- Suicide likely cause of Dr. Sandeep Sherlekar's death, police report shows: 6 things to know
- 12 statistics on social media's presence in the healthcare space
- 38 female spine surgeon leaders to know
- Dr. Gregory Sherr sues HealthEast, CentraCare & 6 neurosurgeons for allegedly ruining his reputation & career — 6 things to know
- 4 North Carolina orthopedic practices merge to create EmergeOrtho: 5 key notes
- Oregon spine surgeon implicated in $22M lawsuit for paralyzing patient with dropped instrument: 5 things to know
- US News & World Report: Top 10 hospitals for orthopedics
- 7 things to know about Mazor Robotics & Medtronic's plans to roll out Mazor X
- 11 highest-paying states for orthopedic surgeons: New Jersey tops the list at $494.5k
- UPMC to pay $2.5M+ to settle neurosurgery-related False Claims Act violation allegations: 7 things to know
- Beyond the implant — DePuy Synthes pushes innovation inside & out of the OR
- 21 statistics and facts for orthopedic surgeons — compensation, net worth and more
- The state of minimally invasive spine surgery: Dr. Frank Phillips on devices, payment & outpatient ASCs
- Are Stryker's hip implants about to be recalled?
- Understanding the Impact of the CMS 2017 ASC Payment Rule on Spine Procedures
- 19 more things to know about orthopedic bundled payments — September 2016
- Trump or Hillary? The physicians have voted
- 5 trends for orthopedic surgeons to watch in 2017
- 15 spine surgeons discuss techniques revolutionizing spine care
- FDA regulation, insurance coverage: Dr. Raj N. Sureja talks challenges in regenerative medicine
- Do you know what patients really care about when choosing a spine surgeon?
- Robotics is here to stay — Drs. Kornelis Poelstra & Dennis Devito on working with Mazor technology
- Medtronic, SeaSpine, Zimmer Biomet & more: 17 key notes
- 3 orthopedic clinics to pay $2.39M to settle False Claims Act allegations: 5 things to know
- 10 thoughts and statistics on medical malpractice claims against orthopedists
- 33 of the largest orthopedic groups in the US by number of physicians
- UCLA pays $8.5M to settle 2 lawsuits after undisclosed spine surgeon relationship with Medtronic: 5 key notes
- 4 of the most pressing challenges orthopedic surgeons face in 2017
- 5 largest orthopedic companies have 61% of market share
- What not to wear — Physician's attire elicits mixed responses in outpatient orthopedic centers
- 8 spine codes CMS proposes for ASC coverage in 2017
- 6 spine physicians ranked #1 on Google - 2016
- Dr. Robert Watkins performs spine surgery on Patriots' Rob Gronkowski
- 8 biggest stories in 2016's spine market — Acquisitions, lawsuits, bundled payments & more
- Orthopedic residency programs violate Match Code of Conduct: 6 things to know
- 7 trends in the spine surgical robot market
- The science of healthcare delivery: 10 thoughts on the future structure of healthcare organizations