PDP Holdings is a company that works with surgeons, hospitals and device manufacturers to provide high quality implants at a lower cost. Their business model allows surgeons to select implants — oftentimes from the same suppliers they already use in the operating room — and purchase them directly from the manufacturer, cutting out the distributor and sales rep as the "middle men" in the equation.
Here are three benefits of a PDP's direct purchase implant model:
1. Hospital benefits. Joseph Truhe, senior vice president and general counsel for PDP Holdings, says hospitals can save 10 to 20 percent or more, on these surgical devices, even for the identical supplier. In one case, the company was able to save a Texas hospital 40 percent on devices on a DRG comparison, accounting for the elimination of "upselling" in the OR and the use of non-premium equivalents. Such savings are particularly attractive if the hospital is participating in accountable care organizations, bundled payments or another type of risk-sharing arrangement to lower costs and provide better care
2. Surgeon benefits. Within the company's model, surgeons partner with PDP to lower supply chain costs and control physician preference item decisions. In return, they share in the savings generated by the model. Mr. Truhe says that since physicians take real risk, maintain independence from manufacturers, and operate under strict compliance requirements, this type of venture complies with current regulatory guidance from the Office of the Inspector General.
3. Device company benefits. PDP holds an event where device companies can display their products and invites participating surgeons to examine their options and then make decisions about which devices to use. This access to surgeons is highly sought after and shows that device companies are willing to partner with physicians in their cost-cutting initiatives going forward.
Orthopedic & Spine Industry Company to Know: PDP HoldingsWritten by Laura Dyrda | Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:39
One of the biggest expenses in orthopedic and spine surgery is device and implant costs. Providers often pay a premium for name-brand products, many of which are actually commodities, and the sales representatives that come along with them. However, downward pressure on reimbursement is forcing providers to examine healthcare costs and cut those costs wherever necessary to provide true value-based healthcare.
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2016. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.
Most Read - Devices & Implants
- Where global spine market leaders are headed: 7 key notes on Medtronic, DePuy Synthes, Stryker & more
- Siemens, Ziehm, GE, Hologic, OrthoScan & Medtronic: 26 O-arm & C-arm systems
- PODs under attack again: 5 key notes from the Senate Finance Committee's report
- Zimmer Biomet, NuVasive, Wenzel Spine & more: 21 key notes
- Medtronic invests in Mazor, inks commercial agreement: 6 things to know
Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months
- 336 spine surgeons to know — 2016
- Rumors of a Stryker acquisition of Smith & Nephew swirl once again: 6 key notes
- Google and Johnson & Johnson to form new surgical company — 4 highlights
- Medtronic, Stryker, Zimmer Biomet, DePuy Synthes, Smith & Nephew: Who had the best 2015? 32 things to know
- Did Loma Linda's orthopedic device rep-less strategy work? 5 things to know
- 5 huge reputation management mistakes for surgeons
- Stryker director sells 18k shares, following Smith & Nephew acquisition rumors: 7 points
- Smith & Nephew acquires Blue Belt Technologies — Will Stryker make its move soon? 5 key notes
- Is the Johnson & Johnson job cut an ominous sign for the medical device industry? 5 key thoughts
- Justice Department investigates pain compounding cream for $500M potential fraud: 5 things to know
- Physician receives second-degree murder sentence for overprescribing pain medication: 6 key points
- Population health on a budget: How one orthopedic surgeon succeeded in Chicago's most impoverished neighborhoods
- 10 Things to know about the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model
- Looking ahead to 2016: What excites spine surgeons most?
- 5 most common reasons orthopedic surgeons are sued
- 32 hospitals to pay $28M in spine surgery false claims settlement: 5 things to know
- 10 spine, neurosurgeons on the move in January 2016
- North Carolina physician group creates orthopedic bundled payment system — 5 takeaways
- Dr. James Andrews #5 among richest doctors in the world: 6 points
- Dr. Robert Blok joins Laser Spine Institute — 4 key points
- 5 ways big data will affect healthcare providers in 2016 & beyond
- 5 things to know about wearable technology in medicine
- Zimmer Biomet, Stryker, J&J & more: 26 key notes — AAOS edition
- Stryker, Titan Spine, ConforMIS & more: 16 key notes
- Surgical tech sues Yale-New Haven Hospital surgeon after OR altercation — 5 key notes
- Orthopedic surgeons generate $2.7M for affiliated hospitals; 5.5 times what they make — 5 survey findings
- CJR bundles to pay $25k per episode: 8 statistics on cost breakdown
- 22 spine surgeon leadership awards | 2016
- 15 statistics on orthopedic surgeon starting salaries
- The best way to prepare for the future in spine: Dr. Hyun Bae
- Bundled payments, consolidation & more: How OrthoVirginia is building a future-facing empire
- Top 10 highest-earning physician specialties — Orthopedics leads for 6th consecutive year
- From cost to patient care — The many ways orthopedic bundled payments help hospitals
- Beyond the device: How DePuy Synthes is innovating in orthopedic & spine technology
- 6 statistics on orthopedic surgeon compensation — Which practice setting pays most?
- 13 statistics on neurosurgeon salary in 2016
- The entrepreneur mindset: How an MBA opened doors for one spine surgeon's practice
- Orthopedics and spine — 6 trends for 2016
- The growth of outpatient spine — 9 Key Points
- Top 5 EHR vendors to partner with in 2016